Once the data are prepared and assumptions considered, the next step is to run the Multiple Linear Regression analysis and interpret its output. This stage translates numerical results into meaningful findings relevant to the dissertation’s research questions.
Statistical software packages are commonly used to perform MLR. The process generally involves specifying the dependent variable and the set of independent variables within the software’s regression module.
A distinct advantage is offered by services utilizing Intellectus Statistics. This platform is designed to streamline the entire analysis pipeline. It not only performs the regression but also automates crucial assumption checks and, importantly, generates output in plain English. This feature significantly reduces the complexity and potential for misinterpretation often faced by dissertation students, contributing to quicker progress and potentially lowering costs by minimizing extensive consultations for basic interpretation.
The output from an MLR analysis typically includes several key tables and statistics. Understanding these is essential for a comprehensive dissertation results chapter.
Need help conducting your MLR? Leverage our 30+ years of experience and low-cost service to complete your results!
Schedule now using the calendar below.
Interpreting these outputs requires moving beyond simply noting statistical significance. For a dissertation, it is important to discuss the direction and magnitude of effects (B and Beta coefficients), the overall explanatory power of the model (R2), and the statistical significance of both the overall model (F-test) and individual predictors (t-tests). This holistic understanding allows for a richer discussion of the findings in relation to the research questions and existing literature.
The following table provides a summary to aid in interpreting common MLR output components:
Table 1: Multiple Linear Regression Output Interpretation Summary
Output Section | Statistic(s) | What it Tells You | Look For… |
Model Summary | R | Strength of the overall linear relationship between all predictors and the dependent variable. | Higher value indicates stronger relationship (closer to 1). |
R-Square (R2) | Proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the model. | Higher percentage indicates better explanatory power. | |
Adjusted R-Square | R2 adjusted for the number of predictors and sample size; a more conservative estimate of model fit. | Value often preferred over R2, especially for model comparison or generalization. A large drop from R2 may indicate overfitting. | |
ANOVA | F-ratio (F-statistic) | Tests if the overall regression model is statistically significant (i.e., if at least one predictor is non-zero). | Higher F-value suggests a more significant model. |
Sig. (p-value for F) | Probability of observing the F-ratio if the null hypothesis (no relationship) is true. | p<.05 (typically) indicates the overall model is statistically significant. | |
Coefficients | Unstandardized Coefficients (B) | Change in the dependent variable for a one-unit change in the predictor, holding others constant. | Sign (+/-) indicates direction of relationship; magnitude indicates size of effect in original units. Used for regression equation. |
Standardized Coefficients (Beta, β) | Change in the dependent variable (in SD units) for a one SD change in the predictor; allows comparison of predictors. | Larger absolute Beta value indicates stronger relative predictive power. | |
t-value | Tests if an individual predictor’s coefficient (B) is significantly different from zero. | Larger absolute t-value suggests greater significance. | |
Sig. (p-value for t) | Probability of observing the t-value if the predictor has no effect (B=0). | p<.05 (typically) indicates the predictor is statistically significant. | |
Confidence Intervals for B | Range of plausible values for the true population coefficient. | If the interval does not contain 0, the predictor is statistically significant. | |
Tolerance / VIF (Variance Inflation Factor) | Indicates multicollinearity among predictors. | Tolerance < 0.1 or VIF > 10 suggests problematic multicollinearity.17 |
This structured approach to output interpretation helps ensure that students extract the most critical information for their results chapter, thereby supporting a robust and well-defended dissertation.
We work with graduate students every day and know what it takes to get your research approved.