The Toxic Leadership Scale was developed in order to better study behaviors that make effective leaders. This scale can be used with both qualitative and quantitative methodologies and is different from other leadership constructs or scales in that it can significantly predict employee outcomes such as job satisfaction and satisfaction with the supervisor.
Aligning theoretical framework, gathering articles, synthesizing gaps, articulating a clear methodology and data plan, and writing about the theoretical and practical implications of your research are part of our comprehensive dissertation editing services.
Andrew Alexander Schmidt
To Access this Instrument
Reliability and Validity
This instrument is reliable, each of the five scales has high reliability (Abusive Supervision: ɑ=0.93, Authoritarian Leadership: ɑ=0.89, Narcissism: ɑ=0.88, Self-Promotion: ɑ=0.91, Unpredictable Leadership: ɑ=0.92).
Administration, Analysis and Reporting
Statistics Solutions consists of a team of professional methodologists and statisticians that can assist the student or professional researcher in administering the survey instrument, collecting the data, conducting the analyses and explaining the results.
For additional information on these services, click here.
Dissertations that have used the Toxic Leadership Scale Instrument
Leet, Edward. (March 2011). The Impact Toxic or Severe Dysfunctional Leadership has on the Effectiveness of an Organization. (Murdoch University).
Schmidt, Andrew Alexander. (2008). Development and Validation of the Toxic Leadership Scale. (University of Maryland, College Park).