The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS) has 24 items, each using a 7-point likert scale from 1 “Strongly Disagree” to 7 “Strongly Agree.” There are three sub-scales. The Body Shame sub-scale assesses shame felt due to one’s body not fitting society’s expectations.
Aligning theoretical framework, gathering articles, synthesizing gaps, articulating a clear methodology and data plan, and writing about the theoretical and practical implications of your research are part of our comprehensive dissertation editing services.
Purchasing and permission information
Reliability and Validity
Body Shame sub-scale internal consistencies a = 0.75 (McKinley & Hyde, 1996), a = 0.78 (Greenleaf & McGreer, 2006) and a = 0.79 (Forbes, Jobe, & Revak, 2006).
Body Shame sub-scale Concurrent validity supported by significant positive correlations between the Body Shame Scale and measures of sedentary individuals with disordered eating (ß= .398, p = .007) and those who are physically active (ß= .252, p = .045) (Greenleaf & McGreer, 2006).
There is a positive correlation of the Body Shame sub-scale with two sub-scales of the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire-3. Internalization-General Scale (r = .66, p < .001) and the Internalization-Athletic Scale (r = .21, p < .05).
Administration, Analysis and Reporting
Statistics Solutions consists of a team of professional methodologists and statisticians that can assist the student or professional researcher in administering the survey instrument, collecting the data, conducting the analyses and explaining the results.
For additional information on these services, click here.
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215.