Mentorship Effectiveness Scale

The Mentorship Effectiveness Scale was developed to provide a standardized tool for rating the mentorship experience and effectiveness of the mentor, focusing specifically on 12 behavioral aspects of the mentor. The format for the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale consists of a 12-item questionnaire and a 6-point Likert-style response for each.

request a consultation

Discover How We Assist to Edit Your Dissertation Chapters

Aligning theoretical framework, gathering articles, synthesizing gaps, articulating a clear methodology and data plan, and writing about the theoretical and practical implications of your research are part of our comprehensive dissertation editing services.

  • Bring dissertation editing expertise to chapters 1-5 in timely manner.
  • Track all changes, then work with you to bring about scholarly writing.
  • Ongoing support to address committee feedback, reducing revisions.

Ron A Berk, Janet Berg, Rosemary Mortimer, Benita Walton-Moss, and Theresa Yeo

Obtaining the MES

Mentorship Effectiveness Scale

Administration, Analysis and Reporting

Statistics Solutions consists of a team of professional methodologists and statisticians that can assist the student or professional researcher in administering the survey instrument, collecting the data, conducting the analyses and explaining the results.

For additional information on these services, click here.


Berk, R., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss., B., & Yeo, T. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1),66-71.

Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson. View

Feiman-Nemser, S. (1996). Teacher mentoring: A critical review. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397969).

National Education Association (NEA). (2007). Keeping new teachers in the profession: 2003 mentoring programs honored by NEA-Saturn/UAW. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from

Rowley, J. (1999). The good mentor. Educational Leadership, 56(8), 20-22.