Understanding Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs)

In the world of data analysis, making sense of diverse data types can be a complex task. Enter Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs), two powerful statistical tools designed to simplify this process. These models are adept at handling data that come in various forms, making them indispensable for researchers and analysts across different fields.

The Essence of GLMs and GEEs

GLMs and GEEs are built to manage data that follow specific patterns or distributions. Here’s a quick overview:

  • Normal Distribution: This is for continuous data, such as measuring heights or weights. It’s the kind of data that can take on any value within a range.
  • Multinomial Distribution: When data can be ordered but not quantified—like survey responses that range from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”—this distribution comes into play.
  • Binomial Distribution: This suits binary data, which has two outcomes. A classic example is a “yes” or “no” question.
  • Poisson Distribution: Count data, or data representing the number of times an event occurs (especially rare events), fit this distribution well.

These models don’t just throw all data into a one-size-fits-all category. Instead, they recognize the unique nature of each data type and analyze it accordingly.

ANOVA help?

Option 1: User-friendly Software

Transform raw data to written interpreted results in seconds.

Option 2: Professional Statistician

Collaborate with a statistician to complete and understand your results.

Breaking Down the Assumptions

While GLMs and GEEs are flexible, they do rest on certain assumptions:

  • Distribution Independence: Unlike some other models, GLMs and GEEs don’t require the dependent or independent variables to follow a normal distribution.
  • Non-linearity and Variance: There’s no need for a linear relationship between predictors and the outcome, nor for the variance of the dependent variable to be consistent across its range.
  • Link Function Linearity: The models assume that there is a linear relationship in the link function, which connects the model linearly to the mean of the distribution.
  • No Multicollinearity: These models work best when predictors are not too highly correlated with each other.

Data Types Handled

GLMs and GEEs are adept at working with continuous, ordinal, or binary outcome data. This versatility allows them to be applied in a wide array of scenarios, from health research to marketing analysis.

Simplifying Complex Analysis

What makes GLMs and GEEs particularly valuable is their ability to simplify the analysis of complex data. By accommodating different data distributions and relaxing some of the stringent assumptions of other statistical models, they offer a more flexible approach to understanding the world through data.

Whether you’re examining the effectiveness of a new drug, the impact of marketing strategies, or the factors influencing educational achievements, GLMs and GEEs provide a robust framework for making sense of the numbers. With these models, data doesn’t have to be shoehorned into unsuitable formats; it can be analyzed in a way that respects its inherent characteristics, leading to more accurate and meaningful conclusions.

In essence, GLMs and GEEs are not just statistical tools; they are bridges connecting raw data to real-world insights, making them invaluable assets in data-driven decision-making.

Generalized Linear Model Resources

Ballinger, G. A. (2004). Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127-150.

Beretvas, S. N., & Williams, N. J. (2004). The use of hierarchical generalized linear model for item dimensionality assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41(4), 379-395.

Cardot, H., & Sarda, P. (2005). Estimation in generalized linear models for functional data via penalized likelihood. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 92(1), 24-41.

Fox, J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2007). Generalized linear models and extensions (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

Hoffman, J. P. (2003). Generalized linear models: An applied approach. Boston: Pearson, Allyn, & Bacon.

Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2005). Estimation of growth curve models with structured error covariances by generalized estimation equations. Behaviormetrika, 32(2), 155-163.

Johnson, T. R. (2006). Generalized linear models with ordinally-observed covariates. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59(2), 275-300.

Johnson, T. R., & Kim, J. -S. (2004). A generalized estimating equations approach to mixed-effects ordinal probit models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57(2), 295-310.

McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.

Mukherjee, B., & Liu, I. (2009). A note on bias due to fitting prospective multivariate generalized linear models to categorical outcomes ignoring retrospective sampling. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100(3), 459-472.

Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 135(3), 370-384.

Rogers, W. H. (1993). Comparison of nbreg and glm for negative binomial. Stata Technical Bulletin, 3(16), 1-32.

Schluchter, M. D. (2008). Flexible approaches to computing mediated effects in generalized linear models: Generalized estimating equations and bootstrapping. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(2), 268-288.