Every dissertation methodology chapter and every IRB application requires a data analysis plan. But most students treat it like a formality; a few paragraphs tacked onto Chapter 3. That’s a mistake. Your data analysis plan is the section where your committee decides whether your study is actually viable.
Get it right, and your methodology sails through IRB, your committee signs off, and you’re collecting data within weeks. Get it wrong, and you’re stuck in revision loops arguing about statistical tests you didn’t fully understand when you chose them.
That’s why thousands of doctoral students have turned to Dr. Jim Lani to build a data analysis plan that holds up, and to reach the tipping point that moves them from proposal to data collection.

20 minutes. No obligation. No pressure.
The data analysis plan sits at the intersection of everything: your research questions, your hypotheses, your measurement levels, your statistical tests, your assumptions, and your sample size justification. Every piece has to align, and most students have never had to put all of these together in a single, defensible document before.
The wrong statistical test means your committee sends it back. Missing assumptions mean your IRB application stalls. A weak power analysis means your sample size gets questioned. One misalignment creates a chain reaction that can delay you by months.
You don’t need to become a statistician overnight. You need someone who builds these plans every day and can get yours right the first time.
BONUS: Every data analysis plan engagement includes alignment review between your research questions, hypotheses, variables, and statistical tests, so your committee sees a methodology that tells one airtight story.
Everything you need to submit a data analysis plan that gets approved, often drafted same-day.
The way you phrase your research question determines which statistical test is appropriate. This is where most students make their first critical error; and where we make sure you don’t.
Questions about differences (“Is there a difference in X between groups?”) typically call for t-tests, ANOVAs, or MANOVAs.
Questions about prediction (“Does X predict Y?”) typically require regression analyses.
Questions about relationships (“Is there a relationship between X and Y?”) typically call for correlations or chi-square analyses, depending on measurement level.
We help you phrase your questions correctly from the start, then match each one to the right test with the right justification. No guesswork. No committee pushback.
With 30 years of experience, I’ve personally developed thousands of data analysis plans across virtually every quantitative design; from simple t-tests to structural equation modeling. I handle every plan personally. You work directly with me, not a team of rotating analysts.
My goal isn’t just to hand you a plan. It’s to make sure you understand it — so when your committee asks why you chose a particular test, or your IRB reviewer questions your power analysis, you have the answer ready.
One conversation can be the tipping point between a methodology that stalls and one that gets approved.
Every week you spend stuck on your data analysis plan is a week you’re not collecting data, not writing results, not moving toward graduation. The plan is the bridge between your proposal and your study. Build it right.
The tipping point is here. Cross it.

20 minutes. No obligation. No pressure.
30 years. Thousands of dissertations. Same-day results.